User Review Seagate 2tb Firecuda Gaming Sshd Sata 6gb/s 64mb Cache 25-inch Hard Drive (St2000lx001)
Seagate FireCuda 2.5 SSHD: Review
Seagate FireCuda 2.5 SSHD: Review
Published Saturday, July 14, 2018 - fifteen:51
A few months ago, I decided to option upward an HP Omen laptop for mobile productivity and gaming. The laptop came with a generic HGST (Hitachi) 7200RPM 1TB hard drive which simply won't cut it. I decided to upgrade the primary drive with an M.2 SSD and needed something with bulk storage that was budget friendly. Here enters the Seagate FireCuda ii.5 SSHD that is promoted as both gaming and productivity focused. The bulldoze comes in a max size of 2TB, and I opted for the max to support multiple games, and multimedia enabled projects for BenchSpotter.
Introduction
The two.five-inch drives come up in iii options: 500GB (ST500LX025), 1TB (ST1000LX015), and 2TB (ST2000LX001). The drives come with an embedded 8GB NAND that promises to enhance Gaming, Application, and Operating System performance across the board. Seagate promises 140% Faster / 50% Faster, 450% Faster / 300% Faster, 35% Faster / 25% Faster respectively for each category compared to mutual 5400 and 7200 RPM two.5 inch hard drives on the market.
Each model comes with a SATA 6Gb/s interface and a 5-twelvemonth warranty from Seagate. All models of the FireCuda drives promise the same transfer rates of up to 140 MB/s and operate at an (unpromoted) spindle speed of 5400RPM.
Hardware
Test Methodology
I have performed testing that should represent games and applications fairly. These results are not definitive but should provide enough information to set up performance expectations before purchasing. I've included games, tools, and benchmarks to reflect the overall performance.
For this examination, I copied a large video file (12GB) from an 1000.2 SSD to the FireCuda ii.5-inch 2TB bulldoze. This test produces consistent results for expected write capabilities of large files onto the SSHD.
The second part of this test is meant to measure read performance. Once the large file had been copied to the FireCuda SSHD, I performed another copy back to the Chiliad.two SSH drive from the FireCuda SSHD to measure out max read capabilities.
I used the M.2 SSD bulldoze to eliminate read and write throttling for the copy activeness.
I've included an extensive archive which has 28,274 files and iii,330 folders that would be common for backups or website athenaeum. This examination is intended to test the speed of operations on the deejay equally opposed to sizeable individual file copies.
I've included 2 popular games that are known for their loading screens and loading fourth dimension. A total system reboot was performed between testing to ensure no OS or system cache would impact loading results.
Fallout 4
- Initial Save Loading
- Decease On Expiry
- Load Different Save
Earth of Warcraft: Legion
- Initial Globe Loading (Dalaran - Krasus Landing)
- Load New Zone (The Fel Hammer)
- Reload Zone (The Fel Hammer)
This test is very straightforward and consequent. The PCMark 8 benchmark suite includes a storage-specific set up of tests to simulate normal desktop activities. The testing consists of a sampling of gaming and productivity usage.
Keep in mind; this is a imitation exam using standard tools and libraries to simulate workloads. They don't include all use cases only provide a full general idea of performance for productivity and gaming tasks.
PCMark 8 provides several benchmark tests, and for this purpose, only storage benchmarking had been used.
AIDA64 provides a lot of insight into your hardware and benchmarks for overall performance metrics. I specifically used the Disk Benchmark tool to provide a general read performance assay on each disk. This test is labeled "Read Test Suite" within the AIDA64 - Disk Benchamrk examination options.
I'm personally non a fan of this examination equally information technology offers inconsistent results on a regular footing. That said, information technology does provide a basis for max read/write capabilities overall. For the examination, I left all size and thread configurations on default and ran the exam multiple times to get a sense of an average.
Assimilate these results with grains of salt as different settings and activeness tin can bear upon these results. I did my best to remove any possible ecology influences and provided results that would at best reflect an average run for each bulldoze.
Results
Okay! Now that all the information and testing details have been provided; let's spring right into the dirty details.
Seagate FireCuda 2.v" 2TB
Hitachi Travelstar 2.5" 1TB
Determination
Honestly, the results seem to be a mixed bag. The Seagate FireCuda bulldoze appears to deliver on the promise of productivity improvements with information technology'southward SSD embedded storage simply suffers in some write and read tests. I call up information technology's important to continue in mind this drive is 5400RPM compared to the 7200RPM HGST Travelstar drive. This means it creates less heat, noise, and pulls less power than the HGST bulldoze. Overall, I'm impressed that this SSHD bulldoze was able to compete with the generic HGST 7200RPM drive for read and write capabilities.
Recommendation
Given the cost tag of $91 (US), it seems like a great deal because the performance, lower heat, dissonance, and power usage. If yous are looking for an Xbox, PS4, Laptop, or an external 2.v-inch drive, the Seagate FireCuda has a lot to offer for the toll.
Where to buy?
- Seagate FireCuda 2.five-inch - 2TB
- Seagate FireCuda ii.v-inch - 1TB
- Seagate FireCuda two.5-inch - 500GB
Action Shots
Support OUR EFFORTS
Source: https://benchspotter.com/content/seagate-firecuda-25-sshd-review
0 Response to "User Review Seagate 2tb Firecuda Gaming Sshd Sata 6gb/s 64mb Cache 25-inch Hard Drive (St2000lx001)"
Post a Comment